High dose flu vaccine for seniors question

Yesterday I asked the Minister of Health why her government doesn't cover the cost of the high dose flu vaccine for seniors. View the video and read our exchange below!

“SUSAN LEBLANC: My question is for the Minister of Health and Wellness. Flu season has begun, and Public Health is urging everyone to get their flu shot, especially people over 65. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization says that seniors should get the high-dose flu vaccine, but many will not because of the cost, which can be $80 or more. My question for the minister is simple: Will her government cover the cost of the high-dose flu vaccine?

HON. MICHELLE THOMPSON: High-dose flu vaccination is available in congregate settings, high-risk settings, this year as it has been for the past number of years.

We do feel and know from science that the regular flu shot, which all of us get, is effective in the community, and we will continue to publicly fund that flu vaccine this year.

SUSAN LEBLANC: Mr. Speaker, seniors in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, New Brunswick, P.E.I., Yukon, and the Northwest Territories will have their highdose flu vaccine for free. The average cost of an influenza hospitalization in Canada is over $10,000 and in 2020, it killed almost 6,000 Canadians. Why does the minister believe that seniors in Nova Scotia don’t deserve as much access to the high-dose flu shot as seniors in the other provinces and territories?

MICHELLE THOMPSON: Again, the evidence would show that the regular flu season vaccination covers influenza well. We have also made it more available, actually, in communities this Fall by making sure that we partner with our pharmacy partners. You can now book and plan your immunization online. We continue to support seniors in this province, and we will offer high-dose flu shots in long-term care and other high-risk settings.”

Recognizing Ori Foods for Small Business Week

Continuing to celebrate (yummy) #halifaxsmallbusiness week by talking about Ori Foods in the Nova Scotia Legislature:

Mr. Speaker, I would like to celebrate Small Business Week by recognizing a newer addition to the Dartmouth North small business landscape, Ori Foods Co. The small but mighty restaurant and café is owned and run by Zoë Bartel and Lachlan Culjak, a pastry chef and a chef with international experience. The two previously owned Ori Chocolate Company, which sold its wares at the Alderney Landing Farmers Market. Zoë and Lachlan had been looking to open a spot back home in Nova Scotia when they came upon a space at 258 Wyse Road, just down the street from some of Zoë’s family, and we’re really happy that they chose that spot. Since Ori opened in April 2022, I have enjoyed many delicious locally sourced meals and treats at the beautifully designed café. The food and coffee are truly excellent, and my constituency coordinator, Rebecca, is especially excited that they have two dairy and gluten-free cookie options. I ask the House to join me in thanking Zoë and Lachlan for choosing Dartmouth North as Ori’s home, and I encourage everyone to stop by and taste some delicious treats.

Stepping Stone Congratulations on New Building

I opened up this sitting of the Nova Scotia Legislature by congratulating Stepping Stone on the purchase of a building in #DartmouthNorth. Here is what I said:

Mr. Speaker, Stepping Stone is an organization that supports current and former sex workers, people at risk of entering the sex trade, and people who have been sex-trafficked. Though I have long admired their work, I recently got to know the folks at Stepping Stone a little better, because they started holding programs across the hall from my former constituency office. My office colleagues and I loved the laughter, camaraderie, and energy that Stepping Stone brought to our building. I rise today to congratulate everyone at Stepping Stone on their recent purchase of a building in Dartmouth North. The new-to-them building will be renovated to include space for client drop-in programming, donations, outreach, court support staff, and computers for their clients to use. Excitingly, the upstairs will be turned into an apartment for transitional housing for clients who face barriers to finding and keeping housing. I am thrilled that Stepping Stone is putting down roots in Dartmouth North and I ask the whole House to join me in celebrating this big move for this vital organization.

Preserve & Protect the Dartmouth Lakes Members Statement

April 19, 2021

Mr. Speaker, I rise to bring the attention of the House to the Dartmouth Lakes. This week my colleague from Dartmouth South and I re-sent our letter for the third time to the Minister of Environment, appealing for immediate action to help us preserve these precious ecological gems. These lakes are an invaluable ecological, social and economic resource that must be protected, but their future is caught up in a jurisdictional web which means that each level of government punts responsibility to the next. The MLA for Dartmouth South and I are calling for an urban lakes commission, something that came out of a Lakes Town Hall that we hosted two years ago. Summer is coming, meaning the return of blue-green algae and invasive species that keep us from enjoying the natural beauty of Dartmouth. After an especially challenging year we know how important our outdoor spaces are. It has been two years that we have been advocating for the protection of the Dartmouth lakes, and it’s time that the province take urgent and decisive action.

PERMANENT Rent Control Statement in the Legislature

March 12, 2021

Nova Scotia Legislature

Mr. Speaker, since the Legislature last met, in the Spring of 2020, the issue that I have heard about most in my community, even during COVID-19, has been, unsurprisingly, the problem of unaffordable rents and the need for permanent rent control. Like many other members here, I have received hundreds of emails and phone calls asking me to support rent control in this House. Rent control was also the issue that I heard about most on the doorsteps during the 2017 election - so much so that I brought the issue to our caucus to see if we could push this government to restore rent control, which the Liberal government had cut in the 1990s. Since then, myself and the member for Halifax Needham have tabled legislation on rent control, and both times the bills have died on the order paper due to the lack of support from this government. 200 ASSEMBLY DEBATES FRI., MAR. 12, 2021 Rent control can mean the difference between staying housed and becoming homeless for people in Dartmouth North and all over Nova Scotia, the difference between paying for groceries, medications, and power, or not paying for them. I fully support the temporary rent control measures that were introduced this past Fall. They have made a great difference to Nova Scotians, but we need full, permanent rent control. I hope this government will use this legislative session to bring that in.

Dartmouth North Mental Health Services statement

March 12, 2021

Nova Scotia Legislature

Mr. Speaker, Dartmouth North is a vibrant community that is home to many people facing systemic discrimination and marginalization, including a historical African Nova Scotian community. Our beautiful community has some of the lowest incomes and some of the highest levels of social deprivation, food insecurity, and rates of mental health and addiction disorders in the province. Dartmouth North also has no publicly funded mental health and addictions clinics. From people who access these services, they currently get themselves to downtown Dartmouth to one of the three locations there. Many people walk or use mobility aids to get to their appointments, some take transit and some drive. Later this Spring, Mental Health and Addictions will be closing all downtown Dartmouth locations and moving to a new building in Portland Hills - an increased distance of almost seven kilometres for people in Dartmouth North. This new location is difficult to access by foot, mobility aid, or public transit for people in my community and may mean the difference between getting and not getting mental health services. Mr. Speaker, I am calling on the government to support the call from members of my community and ensure stable and permanent satellite mental health services in accessible locations in Dartmouth North.

#CodeCritical Ambulance Crisis Speech

March 11, 2021

This speech can be read in the official record of the Nova Scotia Legislature, the Hansard, here.

SUSAN LEBLANC: I am glad to rise to speak to this critical issue, though of course saddened at the conditions which make it necessary and the fact that we even have to have this as an emergency debate. It’s not an exaggeration to say that paramedics have been sounding the alarm for years about this issue and so has our caucus.

First, it is important to put on the record some of the basics of the situation at hand. These are the things we know: paramedics are overworked and burning out. They spend hours waiting to offload patients at the hospital. They can work 16-hour shifts without eating. We have been hearing about the various tweaks that this government has been trying for years now, with little result.

The Code Critical issue is not just an ambulance or paramedic issue. It is a systemic, widespread health care system-wide problem that will not be solved by rearranging how our ambulance system works. We need widespread reinvestment in our entire provincial health network. Our system is taxed to the limit and the entire health care system and its backlogs are at the root of the #CodeCritical crisis and paramedics being unable to offload their patients at the hospitals.

Mr. Speaker, for years this government has refused to release a comprehensive report, paid for with $144,000 of public money, that analyzed the paramedic predicament. We know that this is called the Fitch Report. I will say off the bat that part of the campaign to have the Fitch report finally released by the government sent no fewer than 2,500 emails to me and to other members of this House to ask the government - to implore the government - to release the Fitch Report. The excuse that the government gave was that it could impact contract negotiations for our ambulance service provider, Emergency Medical Care Inc.

Finally, after those literally thousands of phone calls and emails from paramedics and their family members and average Nova Scotians who are concerned and, frankly, terrified at the state of our emergency health care system, the government finally decided to release the report years after it was completed.

Of course, upon its release we can see the real reason why it was hidden for so long. The report details the extreme conditions in our health care system that paramedics are faced with when they’re trying to do their job. The report states, “On average, EMC ambulances spend 1.5 hours offloading patients for Category 1 calls” or 3.25 hours measured at the 90th percentile. The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 727 president, Mike Nickerson, has said that he has heard of a paramedic waiting longer than 24 hours to offload a patient. Twenty-four hours to offload a patient. Let’s think for a moment about that patient and that paramedic. What an awful situation. When writing the report, Fitch found that nearly half of the paramedics’ time was spent driving people between different levels of hospital or nursing homes. Of those individuals being transferred between facilities, only two per cent required the skills of a paramedic or the equipment that is in one of the province’s 180 ambulances. Response times are routinely overshot in urban areas.

Fitch calculated the cost of offloading delays faced by paramedics but that important information was redacted. The public is not allowed to know, according to this government. The report also says that offload times appear to grow exponentially after 2018.

The government’s response to these challenges, which they have known about for years, was to issue a directive to the Nova Scotia Health Authority on offload times asking that they be limited to 30 minutes for emergency situations or 12 hours for transport. The former Minister of Health and Wellness tried the same thing in 2019. Offload times decreased for a period, but then increased after that again.

The government has said that it will be implementing 64 of the Fitch Report’s 68 recommendations, but it has not explained which four recommendations won’t be implemented. While I’m standing here, I would certainly urge the government not to implement the recommendation that suggests ambulance fees should be increased: “Review of patient transport fees which may lead to opportunities for increases, particularly as they apply to non-Canadian residents. Additionally, amounts unpaid by Canadian residents could be collected by other means, such as at the time of driver’s and other licence renewals.” I will remind the members of this House that ambulance fees can deter people from seeking medically necessary help.

I will also remind people about our caucus’s bill - which died on the Order Paper when the House was prorogued - to eliminate fees for medically necessary situations. That the government is leaving the door open to increased ambulance fees is, frankly, unacceptable.

No one has to search very far to find horrific stories of people who wait too long for an ambulance. People die while waiting for emergency help, as we tragically learned last month with the death of April George in Bass River. Even more people live in fear of what could happen to themselves, or a loved one, if an ambulance isn’t available to get to them. I know of a family member, for example, who when visiting the province to spend time here and decide whether they wanted to relocate back home here to Nova Scotia, were unfortunately in a car accident in Halifax. An ambulance took the passenger from the other vehicle to Emergency. Though she seemed fine, the paramedic on the scene said the daughter of the family should probably be seen, just in case, but there was not another ambulance to take her to the hospital. The family ended up deciding not to return to Nova Scotia. This experience was part of the decision.

As we find ourselves in a global health pandemic because of the COVID-19 virus, we know that paramedics are putting themselves and their families in harm’s way to take care of Nova Scotians during this pandemic. They will do so again should we experience another wave of the virus. Paramedics are still grappling with the same issues from before COVID-19 arrived, and some have intensified.

Like many things in our province - many systems in our government and in our province - COVID-19 has shed a light on the cracks and the chasms in those systems. This is definitely one of them. Paramedics are still working short and working extremely long shifts without breaks, being worn down, burnt out, and sometimes being assaulted at work. They now also have to contend with the risk of bringing COVID-19 home to their families. The stress is unimaginable, but IUOE 727’s request for temporary housing for paramedics during the pandemic, as was provided in Ontario, was not granted.

A scan of the #CodeCritical campaign shows dozens in the last few days in all corners of the province. Last month, after resuming the #CodeCritical campaign, paramedics reported more than 40 Code Criticals in five days across every health care zone in the province in which very few or no crews were available to respond to local emergencies.

We know the problems and we know the solutions. Frankly, our caucus has flooded this House with solutions to this very complex, multi-faceted health care crisis that is at the root of the Code Critical problem. We have introduced legislation that would build collaborative emergency care centres. We would keep community hospitals open in CBRM. We would allow physician assistants to work in the province and alleviate pressure in the system. We have introduced legislation that would require regular publishing on emergency room standards. We have committed to building a room for every resident and clearing the wait-list for long-term care that causes the extreme shortage of beds in our hospitals. We’re calling for emergency mental health response teams that would work to alleviate the burden placed on paramedics by mental health calls. We are waiting for these to be taken up by this government. We are proposing ideas, but Nova Scotians can’t wait much longer.

Mental Health Emergency Question for the Premier

March 11, 2021

View this exchange in the official record of province house here starting on page 80.

PREM.: MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES - COMMIT

SUSAN LEBLANC Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Premier. Police services have explained that they are not qualified to help people in acute mental health crisis. Both the Truro and Bridgewater police have said that they are not suited to the work. Bridgewater’s deputy chief has said, “We’re not full-time mental health caseworkers. We’re not in crisis management every day. We don’t have that experience from working full time . . . that’s not our profession.” I can table that.

Both chiefs say that much more needs to be done to help Nova Scotians in crisis, especially in rural areas. My question for the Premier is: Does the Premier agree with these police services, that when people call an emergency line in mental health crisis, they should not be met by the police?

THE PREMIER: I agree, we can do a lot more for mental health and addictions, especially what’s been shown throughout the pandemic. I am worried about those Nova Scotians who are experiencing mental health challenges and addictions. That’s why we created a new Office of Mental Health and Addictions within the Department of Health and Wellness. We’ll be hiring a clinician at the head of that office who will be working to ensure that we have more community supports - more capacity in communities - so that we do have more availability for mental health supports in Nova Scotia.

SUSAN LEBLANC: I’d like to thank the Premier for his answer. As an example, Mr. Speaker, last year alone 602 Nova Scotians in mental health crisis were met by the police after seeking help through the provincial crisis line; 7,390 more were referred out by police after someone called 911 searching for help. The police are interacting with people in mental health crisis in Nova Scotia every day. My question for the Premier is: Will the Premier commit, as part of his new initiative in mental health and addictions, to creating a province-wide mental health emergency response service?

THE PREMIER: As the member referenced in her first question, there is a crisis line that can be called and responded to immediately. There’s also another line, if it’s not of an urgent nature. We’re going to continue to bolster support for that and the Kids Help Phone and other supports we have. We’re going to make sure that we have more mental health supports in schools. We did increase the budget last time, but we’re going to look at this upcoming budget to make sure that we are supporting mental health in a more aggressive way.

Tribute to Evelyn Mitchell

Mr. Speaker, on the heels of International Women’s Day, I would like to pay tribute to a phenomenal woman and long-time resident of Dartmouth North, Evelyn Mitchell, who died in 2019. Born in Northern Ontario in 1933, Evelyn, as her daughter Caron wrote, “split firewood, went fishing and helped raise chickens during the Depression.” At 18 she married her husband of 68 years, Doug, a member of the Royal Canadian Air Force. Evelyn brought up her three independent daughters, who she taught to “do no harm but take no crap,” and she took up basket weaving, copper tooling, ceramics, crochet, and upholstery, in addition to sewing and baking. In the 1970s, when she learned that the Red Cross didn’t drive patients from Dartmouth to treatments and appointments, she received permission to run a driving service out of her home. Later Evelyn devoted herself to practising and promoting therapeutic touch, which she discovered was her calling. Evelyn Mitchell would have been the last person to think that she was leaving a strong legacy for her daughters and others, but her life and love inspired their independence and strength in the world.

Speaking to Bill No. 28 - Land Titles Initiative Acceleration Act.

SUSAN LEBLANC: Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to rise to speak in favour of this bill and to see this process moving forward. I just want to say, before I begin my prepared notes, that I am especially pleased that this bill has been put forward by a number of different government departments, which hopefully signals and signifies this government’s commitment to tearing down the silos of departments and having departments work together on issues that are important to Nova Scotians. This bill was essentially sponsored by the Department of Communities, Culture and Heritage; the Office of African Nova Scotian Affairs; the Department of Lands and Forestry; and the Department of Justice - and it is really great to see.

The situation with land titles in historically Black communities in Nova Scotia is one of the clearest examples of systemic racism in our province’s history. I am glad that this bill will address some of the barriers to access, but I am sorry that they were not dealt with years ago ‑ hundreds of years ago, or even four years ago, or three years ago. Systemic, structural, anti‑Black racism means that African Nova Scotians face challenges to accessing employment, education, justice, housing, health care, and other social services.

Property ownership and inheritance is a significant side of power and privilege in our society, but Black Nova Scotians in many parts of the province may not be able to sell or bequeath or mortgage their land for historical reasons that have to do with racism. The land titles process has been excruciatingly slow for too many people and there are still families and communities that won’t be helped under this legislation.

Our caucus office has tried but has not been able to get evaluation information from the department as to how quickly the land titles process is moving or whether the government has set and met benchmarks for the program. Listening to the Minister of Justice’s comments, I would suggest that the government does recognize that the process has been too slow and there’s so much more to do, but we were endeavoring to find out about benchmarks. I’m not sure whether the fact that we couldn’t get the information is because the information simply does not exist or whether this government is not willing to share it.

Mr. Speaker, the Land Titles Initiative has been a striking example of structural racism and how it operates in insidious ways. Despite the apparently good and public intentions of the former Premier and minister, who is now the current Premier, applicants have met with hurdle after hurdle. There was even a case, as my colleague for Dartmouth South referenced, at the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia that struck down an arbitrary criterion that the department was applying to applications in their lengthy deliberations. All the while, the former minister - the current Premier - claimed to be looking for ways to be removing barriers and streamlining processes. I hope it is true that this bill will enable progress on this front.

Again, particularly encouraging is the appointment of Angela Simmonds as the executive director of the program. She has been a tireless champion for Black families in this realm and many others. I believe that the intention is very good with this bill and I am glad that these changes are coming forward. I look forward to hearing from stakeholders at the Law Amendments committee.

May I just say, before I close, that the Law Amendments committee is another example of a place we need to make sure people have access to - especially, in this case, people from the African Nova Scotian communities who may want to contribute to the Law Amendments committee. May I just put it out there that we should make sure that stakeholders in the African Nova Scotian community are made aware that a Law Amendments committee meeting is happening on this bill - I believe it is Monday, but whenever it is happening - and make sure that information is broadly communicated out to the far reaches of the province so we can have as much participation in the very important Law Amendments committee process as possible.

Member's Statement - Michelle Malette Affordable Housing Champion

March 25, 2021

I rise today to honour Michelle Malette, a resident of Dartmouth North, who is a dedicated advocate for housing for all. Michelle is currently the executive director of Out of the Cold shelter, a community-based Winter shelter and an invaluable piece of the shelter system in HRM.

When COVID-19 hit last year, Michelle - not yet the ED, but a volunteer - helped to transition Out of the Cold from a community centre gym to a hotel. For this work, and her former work with women, trans folks, and their families at Adsum House, Michelle was recognized as an Invisible Champion by the Bhayana Family Foundation. As her nominator for the award wrote, “Michelle sees the resilience and dignity in everyone she works with, so she is able to help those individuals get housing and live their best lives.”

Michelle is also an amazing mother and friend, an active member of the city’s queer and trans community, and a member of Solidarity Halifax. I ask the members of this House to join me in expressing thanks to Michelle for her fierce and uncompromising advocacy for housing as a human right and for some of our community’s most vulnerable people.

Emergency Mental Health Response Service Speech

March 24, 2021

Bill No. 24 - Emergency “911” Act

Full debate here starting on page 440.

THE SPEAKER: The honourable member for Dartmouth North.

SUSAN LEBLANC: Mr. Speaker, I am honoured today to rise to speak to our Bill No. 24 - A Series of Amendments to the Emergency “911” Act that would create provincewide emergency mental health response teams. This bill requires the Minister of Municipal Affairs to ensure that 911 is able to dispatch geographically situated emergency mental health response teams across the province and to delineate the expertise, training requirements, and composition, and define the role of peace officers on the teams. Mr. Speaker, this is a service that would save lives. It is consistent with what mental health professionals, community organizations, anti-racist advocates, and police themselves have asked for.

The fact is that our mental health care system is bursting at the seams. It is simply not meeting the needs of Nova Scotians who have struggled with some of the highest rates of mental health challenges in the country, and who, since the COVID19 pandemic, are struggling doubly. We know what more people in this province have reported higher rates of anxiety than anywhere else in Canada since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Twenty-seven per cent of Nova Scotians describe their anxiety level as high, a 20 per cent jump from prepandemic levels. Sixteen per cent of Nova Scotians have reported high levels of depression since the pandemic, more than double the pre-pandemic number of seven per cent. People’s mental health landscapes are simply more complicated than ever before, and the pressures that are pushing people to the brink are more real than ever.

Mr. Speaker, when there is a fire in your home or there is a worry of fire in your home and you call 911, when you can hear the sirens coming in the distance, that is a sense of relief. When someone is having a medical emergency - a physical health medical emergency - and you need to call 911 and you hear the sirens coming, that is a sense of relief. But people who are in mental health crisis possibly do not feel a sense of relief when those sirens start - they can hear the sirens coming in the distance. People who are in mental health crisis should be allowed to feel absolutely safe when they call 911 and know that they will be met by professionals who are equipped and ready to help. Unfortunately, Mr. Speaker, this is not the case, and for too many people, the intersection of mental health crisis and policing can be deadly.

In the last 20 years, 460 Canadians have died in encounters with the police. A substantial majority of these people who were lost struggled with mental health issues or substance abuse or both, and often these issues prompted the call for help in the first place.

The situation is getting worse. According to a CBC investigation, the rate at which people die in interactions with police has nearly doubled in the last 20 years. The investigation also found that Black and Indigenous people were over-represented in these deaths, and I will table that. Tragically, we all know the names of too many of these Canadians. Only last year, Regis Korchinski-Paquet, a Black and Indigenous woman with ties to Nova Scotia, fell to her death from a Toronto balcony after police were called to her home to help. A week later, police in Edmundston, New Brunswick, fatally shot Chantel Moore, an Indigenous woman, after being asked to check on her well-being. In April, D’Andre Campbell, a Black man living with schizophrenia, was killed by police in Toronto after himself calling for mental health help. And, in June, Ejaz Ahmed Choudry, a Toronto man living with schizophrenia, was killed by Peel Region Police after being called to check on his wellbeing.

Closer to home, here in Halifax last year, a 28-year-old man died after police used a taser on him. They were called to the premises after reports that the man was inflicting self-harm. In 2014 in Halifax, Mohammed Eshaq, who lived with schizophrenia, died after he fell from his balcony in the South End while police were in his apartment. They were called there by a nurse after concerns about his mental health care. I could go on and on. Mr. Speaker, this deadly problem is acute for racialized people. We know that structural racism is baked into our justice and policing systems and it is not a surprising outcome that so many people are met by harm when what they desperately need is traumainformed professional help and de-escalation.

This incredible problem means, first, that racialized people are at a higher risk of being criminalized, harmed, or killed in encounters with the police when what they are seeking and what they need is help. We recently heard Emma Halpern, the executive director at the Elizabeth Fry Society of Mainland Nova Scotia, speak about this at a Standing Committee on Community Services. She said,

“Over the last few years in our work, we’ve seen some very concerning trends. We see high numbers of African Nova Scotian and Indigenous girls engaged in our programming around trafficking and exploitation. We see the criminalization of trauma and victimization, particularly for African Nova Scotian and Indigenous women and girls. When police arrive, for example, on scene when an issue has occurred, we see young women and girls being identified as part of the ‘problem’ - being criminalized for small things rather than recognized for what is actually going on, which is their tremendous victimization and trauma.”

I can table that. I believe Emma Halpern would agree that this trend of criminalizing people in crisis is fuelling the over-representation of Black and Indigenous women in the justice system. Second, it means that racialized people are less likely to seek help when they are in crisis if they know or suspect that police might be sent to the scene. It means that this government has a distinct responsibility to protect people seeking help in mental health crisis and to enable alternatives for the thousands of Nova Scotians every year who find themselves in this position.

People deserve better access to mental health care in this province, including, and possibly especially, when they are in crisis. That means making appropriate emergency help available to people, not necessarily the police. All of this, Mr. Speaker, is why a key demand for the Black Lives Matter movement is to defund the police. From Black Lives Matter Canada:

“Taxpayers spend over $41 million per day collectively on police services across the country. This does not include spending on the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, railway and military police, and government departments enforcing specific statutes in the areas of income tax, customs and excise, immigration, fisheries and wildlife. In engaging in these policing practices, police forces across the country routinely engage in surveillance against Black and Indigenous people, constrain our movements, harm and kill us. We believe that Black communities, and all communities, deserve better. The $41 million per day that is being spent on policing is not creating safer, more secure communities. This funding can be reallocated to create safer and more secure societies for all of us, and to rid Black and Indigenous communities of a serious threat to our safety.”

I will table that, Mr. Speaker. Allocating these resources and defunding the police means having systems set up that are safer and more appropriate. That is the spirit behind this bill, and I urge my government colleagues to support it. It is important to explain a little bit about what the movement to defund the police is about. It is about reallocating resources to community-based and other government organizations that are better equipped to deal with the roots of the non-violent issues that police are mostly called on to address, such as homelessness, mental health, and addictions. The police are the first to admit that they are increasingly called on to address everything, from potholes to cats stuck in trees. It’s simply about ensuring that the best, most appropriate help is deployed, which will work upstream to address the root of the problems people are experiencing. We will all know by now that police services across the country and here in Nova Scotia agree that they are not equipped to deal with the mental health crisis situations that they are asked to respond to. Chief Dave MacNeil of the Truro Police Service has said of mental health crisis response:

“This isn’t the type of work that we sign on to do, and it’s not the type of work that we’re actually trained well to do . . . We don’t call mental health clinicians to respond to break and enters, but unfortunately the police are kind of the agency of last resort . . .We’re the only 24/7 helping agency in most communities, and people call the police for all kinds of things.”

Bridgewater Deputy Police Chief Danny MacPhee says,

“We’re not full-time mental health case workers. We’re not in crisis management every day. We don’t have that experience from working full time . . . That’s not our profession. That’s not who we are.”

Both have asked for more crisis response resources in rural Nova Scotia.

Adrienne Peters, an assistant professor of sociology and a liaison and co-coordinator for police studies at Memorial University in Newfoundland, explains how this can go wrong.

“We do live in the society in which there is institutional racism. Police are simply an institution within this working system, mostly governed by the priorities and the mandate of government and what they’ve set forth for them.”

I will table that. This means that it is squarely in this government’s set of responsibilities to develop alternatives to the currently dangerous and mismatched arrangement that is the case today for so many Nova Scotians in mental health crisis.

I feel it’s important to comment on the cost of such an initiative, as I suspect this might be at the root of any opposition to the bill by the government members. Firstly, meeting the World Health Organization’s recommended minimum 10 per cent of health spending on mental health, as is committed to by the NDP’s Mental Health Bill of Rights, would help fund essential mental health services such as this.

Secondly, police are already doing the work of responding to people in mental health emergencies, though as I have described, many agree that they are not equipped to appropriately fill this role. The crucial point of defunding the police is about reallocating existing resources so that more compassionate, safe, and appropriate services can be enabled.

There are untold costs from the justice system that are rooted in criminalization of mental health issues, many of which could be avoided if we could get people suitable mental health support in crisis. Of course, the price we risk paying is in people’s safety if we fail to act. To summarize all of the comments about cost: it is more expensive not to put this program into place.

When people are in physical health crisis - when they are experiencing cardiac arrest, or stroke, or are in a life-threatening accident - as a society, we have committed that they should have emergency help available to them no matter where they are or what time of day or night they may need it. Mental health crisis can be lethal, and there is no reason why we should not make this same emergency help available to people in distress.

Pandemic Eviction Ban Statement in the Legislature

March 24, 2021

SUSAN LEBLANC: Mr. Speaker, nearly a year ago during the first wave of the pandemic, the Province brought in a temporary eviction ban for those who have lost income due to COVID‑19. This ban made sense. No one should be evicted due to a loss of income during a global pandemic. In fact, no one should be evicted during a pandemic at all. After all, one cannot stay home if one doesn’t have a home to stay in. The eviction ban was lifted at the end of June. Since then, my office has been supporting several people who are being evicted during the second wave of the pandemic due to an inability to pay rent. In some cases, they cannot pay rent because their work hours have been cut or they have been laid off due to the pandemic. Time and time again, the people who have stepped up to help these folks raise the money to stay in their homes are churches, benevolent funds, and not‑for‑profits. Folks scramble to these organizations and if they are lucky, each one helps with a few hundred dollars and, of course, we know that not everyone is getting the help they need. In HRM alone, right now there are 200 homeless people at least. The government should not be reliant on charitable gifts to keep their citizens housed during a pandemic. A full eviction ban needs to be a part of this government’s response to COVID‑19.

Member's Statement - GEO Project, Public Good Society of Dartmouth

March 24, 2021

The COVID-19 pandemic has shone light on issues in our communities, and one of the most troubling is people’s access to technology and the internet, even in urban areas where connectivity is strong. In the (Inaudible) pandemic as workplaces, places of worship, and community groups pivoted their operations online, it became clear that those who did not have a computer or the internet were missing out. Never mind not being able to connect with family and friends - important public health information; school, work and health appointments; and even 12-step programs went virtual. Many people were left out or left behind. This is where the GEO Project came in. Created by the Public Good Society of Dartmouth in partnership with Lake City Works, GEO - Getting Everyone Online - provided free internet, computers, webcams and headsets to those who needed them. It was a real lifeline for people in Dartmouth North and beyond. This past fall, the Bhayana Family Foundation awarded the GEO Project one of their Invisible Champion Awards. The internet has become a basic necessity, and this province must find ways to get Nova Scotians who live on low incomes connected.

Question to Premier about Race Based Data March 23

We know from other jurisdictions that COVID-19 has hit racialized communities harder. In Toronto’s second wave of the virus, nearly 80 per cent of COVID-19 cases were among racialized groups. I can table that. It is a virtual certainty that this problem exists here in Nova Scotia, but we just don’t know for certain because this government has refused to collect race-based demographic data in health care, despite years of work and advocacy in the African Nova Scotian community to get this done. How does the Premier expect to address racism in this province if his government won’t collect basic data on the problem?